Optimizing Peak Demand FactorWhat Is Operational Carbon Risk and Why Does It Matter Now?

Climate Risk in Practice Series – Part 1

Have you ever heard the term climate risk come up in conversations about sustainability, regulations or corporate responsibility, but weren’t quite sure how it applies to your organization’s day-to-day reality? Or perhaps the idea feels abstract, disconnected from the actual decisions made in managing buildings, infrastructure, energy use or sustainability strategies.

That’s were operational carbon risk comes in. While carbon has become a politicized term in some public discourse, it’s something far more concrete in an operational context: a measurable, practical side of climate risk. For starters, it shows up in your utility costs, operating budgets, capital planning, and regulatory compliance. 

Understanding this connection helps organizations shift from theory to action, focusing on real operational levers that influence risk, cost, and performance. This first edition of our series breaks down what operational carbon risk is, why it matters now, and how to begin understanding it in clear and actionable ways.

Starting with the Big Picture: What Is Operational Carbon Risk?

Climate risk refers to the financial, operational, and reputational threats posed by a changing climate. The now-dismantled Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD), whose framework has since been adopted by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), defined climate-related risks in two categories that are still widely used today:

  • Transition risks: Risks associated with the shift to a low-carbon economy, such as new climate mitigation policies, evolving technologies, and changing market or stakeholder expectations.
  • Physical risks: Risks stemming from climate-related events, including extreme weather (acute) or long-term shifts in climate patterns (chronic), such as heatwaves or rising sea levels.

These types of risks are often framed at a strategic level, which can make them feel disconnected from day-to-day operations. In this series, we focus on operational carbon risk, a practical and actionable subset of both transition and physical risks. It refers to an organization’s scope 1 and 2 emissions, including how climate-related pressures materialize in real-time through utility costs, energy performance, infrastructure choices, and operational decisions. From how data is tracked to how systems are run; operational carbon risk is embedded in the way facilities are managed every day.

Breaking Down Operational Carbon Risk

Zooming in further, operational carbon risk refers to the specific performance challenges and financial exposures tied to an organization’s energy use, emissions profile, and facility infrastructure. Simply put: if an organization consumes energy to heat, cool, light, or operate its buildings, it is exposed to operational carbon risk.

This risk manifests in real-world decisions such as:

  • Whether to replace an aging boiler or extend its life
  • How to plan HVAC loads during extreme weather events
  • How to prepare for emissions-related regulatory changes or insurance premium adjustments

When proactively understood, operational carbon risk becomes a lever for improving performance across key areas:

  • Anticipating and managing regulatory costs, such as Canada’s carbon pricing framework
  • Controlling utility-related operational expenditures
  • Unlocking financial incentives and funding tied to energy and emissions performance
  • Meeting rising stakeholder expectations for environmental disclosure
  • Adapting to changes in the operating environment, including heatwaves and wildfire smoke events

Operational carbon risk is not just about emissions data. It sits at the intersection of infrastructure performance, energy use, capital strategy, and resilience. For example, deciding whether to upgrade a natural gas boiler to a more efficient system isn’t just a like-for-like capital cost decision, it impacts long-term emissions exposure, utility bills, and regulatory compliance.

Key Questions to Understand Operational Carbon Risk

Understanding operational carbon risk doesn’t start with data, it starts with awareness. Data is a tool for managing the risk, but the first step is recognizing where and how that risk exists. Key questions to help assess it include:

  • Do you have a system and process in place to track your energy and emissions?
  • Which operations drive the bulk of your emissions?
  • Are your energy-intensive systems aligned with current and future regulations?
  • How might changing climate conditions (such as heatwaves, droughts, floods) impact building performance?
  • Are you considering emissions and energy exposure in capital and asset planning?
  • What dependencies do you have on carbon-intensive inputs or energy sources?

These questions help organizations identify where the risk is most concentrated, and where the biggest opportunities for mitigation or value creation lie.

Why This Matters

Understanding this risk enables organizations to act strategically, turning potential liabilities into performance opportunities. Managing operational carbon risk supports:

Smarter Regulatory Alignment 

In Canada, the federal government has pledged to reduce emissions by 40–45% below 2005 levels by 2030. To support this goal, a carbon pricing benchmark of $170 per tonne of COe by 2030 has been introduced through two key mechanisms:

  1. A consumer fuel charge (currently set at $0/tonne as of April 1, 2025), and
  2. An industrial pricing program, which remains active at $95/tonne (2025).

These mechanisms embed the cost of emissions into everyday energy use and industrial activity, meaning carbon risk is already present in utility bills, supply chain inputs, and operational decisions, whether it’s immediately visible or not.

For example, there is an embedded cost of carbon in each kilowatt hour we use from the Ontario grid or in the consumption of manufactured products through industrial carbon pricing.  

Understanding this risk allows organizations to anticipate future pricing changes, avoid reactive spending, and make informed operational decisions that protect budgets and performance.

Adapting to a Changing Operational Landscape

Climate change is already reshaping how facilities are run. In North America, summer temperatures are increasingly breaking records, with several regions experiencing multiple days above 40°C. 

These environmental changes are altering operational norms: HVAC systems are running longer, ventilation rates are being adjusted to improve indoor air quality, and energy demand is spiking. These shifts often reveal hidden inefficiencies in building systems, such as outdated cooling equipment, poor insulation, or inadequate automation, leading to higher energy consumption, rising costs, and increased emissions.

These are not abstract risks. They are direct, measurable examples of operational carbon risk in action, where climate-driven changes impact performance, cost, and emissions on a day-to-day basis.

Strengthen Capital and Infrastructure Planning

Operational carbon risk is closely tied to the systems that keep buildings running, from HVAC and lighting to boilers and controls. These assets influence not only long-term investment decisions (CapEx), but also day-to-day utility costs (OpEx).

For instance, in the MUSH sector, energy use alone can represent up to 10% of annual government operating budget, according to the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy. That makes infrastructure planning a critical lever for both cost control and emissions performance.

By integrating carbon and energy considerations into capital planning, organizations can select systems that reduce emissions, lower operating expenses, and ensure alignment with evolving regulations. 

Unlock Financial Opportunities 

Programs offering funding for energy retrofits, clean infrastructure upgrades, and performance incentives increasingly require a clear understanding of operational carbon risk and project emissions accounting. Organizations that have not assessed their carbon exposure may find themselves ineligible for support or unable to meet program criteria.

Therefore, organizations that understand this risk can access grants, unlock incentives, and position themselves as strong candidates for partnerships. It also enables teams to demonstrate measurable progress toward internal performance targets and external expectations.

In Summary: A Lever for Value

Operational carbon risk isn’t just about emissions, it’s about how energy, infrastructure, and external conditions interact to shape cost, compliance, and long-term performance. 

Understanding it helps organizations:

  • Make informed CapEx decisions
  • Avoid regulatory surprises
  • Tap into funding and incentive streams
  • Improve operational resilience
  • Strengthen climate-related disclosures and reputation

What’s Next?

This blog laid the groundwork by asking: What is operational carbon risk, and why does it matter?

In the next edition of the Carbon Series, we’ll shift from understanding to action. We’ll explore how to:

  • Assess your Scope 1 and 2 emissions
  • Leverage technology to manage your risk
  • Link emissions performance to infrastructure decisions
  • Plan strategically for decarbonization and cost avoidance

Blackstone Can Help

For organizations looking to better understand their operational carbon risk, Blackstone Energy Services is here to help. Whether there are questions, a need for guidance, or uncertainty about where to begin, our team is available to support the process.

 With over 20 years of experience working with public and private sector clients, Blackstone combines technical expertise, data-driven strategies, and regulatory insight to help organizations manage emissions, improve performance, and transition to low-carbon, energy-efficient operations.

To start a conversation or request support, contact: info@blackstoneenergy.com